Tuesday, May 31, 2011

The Difference between Publishing and Producing of Books

You have a manuscript and would like to get it published in bookform? 
Read here what your options are.

Paria Publishing's publishing arm specializes in books about the history of Trinidad and Tobago. We would hardly consider any other material for publication. Our actual publishing activites are very limited; maybe one or two books a year. Our distribution is exclusively to some retailers in Trinidad, and online via amazon.com and barnesandnoble.com.

However, if you have a manuscript on any topic that you wish to self-publish, in which case you need to finance the publication, then we can give you a quotation what this would approximately cost. 

The first thing that you need to understand is the difference between publishing and producing. He who pays is the publisher. So if you have written a book and you are now paying to get illustrations, book design and printing done, then you are a self-publisher and you retain the rights to your publication.

The producer of the book works for a fee, but has no rights to the publication. Producing means seeing about all the steps required that get the manuscript to the finished book.

You can also submit your manuscript to a publisher to publish this book for you. In this case, you give up all say with regards to the production of the book (i.e. choice of illustrator, what the book looks like etc.), and the distribution channels. All you would receive are royalties as the books are sold.

Paria Publishing usually undertakes to be the producers for your book, not the publishers. In that case, we do the design and layout of the book and see about getting it printed and delivered to you. You can then organize the distribution of your book. For this, Paria Publishing charges a fee for design and layout, and the printers charge for the printing.

So if you are a budding self-publisher, get in touch with us to produce your book for you!

Some of the self-publishers/authors for whom we have produced books are:

• LeRoy Clarke
• Jackie Hinkson
• Andy Campbell
• Esmond Farfan
• Garth Lyder
• Ana Ferreira
• Jonathan de la Rosa
• George Brizan
• Naparima Girls High School
• Beverley Steele
• Kathy Hosein
• Ryan James
• The Judiciary of Trinidad and Tobago

and many more!

Monday, May 2, 2011

The Voice in the Govi

by Gerard A. Besson


A magical visit to the realms of imagination of those who lived in the 19th century Caribbean


A Fictional Novella

The Voice in the Govi whispers to the reader of generations of beautiful Caribbean women, scintillating the lines between life, death, and the in-between. Listen to its murmurs of adventurous voyages between islands, continents and worlds, to its sighs of love and passion, to its rumours of magic both evil and good. Hark! and your Gros Bon Ange will speak in tongues—in French, Patois or English—about a time when a beautiful new race of women was born in the plaçage of the Antilles, la femme de couleur, to whom male pa ka chanjé kon lapli (mistfortunes do not happen like rain). A time when the imagination of those who lived in these islands was inspired by folklore and religion, by petro and rada, by the ever-thinning veil between life and afterlife, when souls had to be brought back from beneath the waters, retirer d’en bas de l’eau.

The story told by Gerard Besson in the tradition of Caribbean Magical Realism follows several generations of Afro-French-Creole girls and women (and their men) throughout the 19th century, out from the times of slavery and across the Caribbean Sea, from Saint-Domingue to Trinidad. Devoted to the Orisha of Love, Erzulie, and possessed of intoxicating beauty and of innate goodness, these women inherit the powers of healing and of clairvoyance. Lifelong companions and lovers, La Sirène Rosa and Amélie Eugénie fight a battle against the main-gauche sorcerer’s tricks of the boy Naza and his evil-minded secret society of cochons sans poils, pigs without hair, whereby they have to bring back zombis from literally a fate worse than death, and ultimately fight a terrifying battle against a murderous soucouyant. 

In his Antillean novella, Besson pulls his reader into a past that shimmers like a butterfly’s wing, blending together shades of magic and of history in one captivating tale that radiates the sights, sounds and scents of a time when times were changing in these islands below the wind. 


Excerpts from Voice in the Govi:
"The first lash hit in his heart, it felt like he was being pierced by an ice-pick. Antoine Paseau was just leaving his grandmother’s house on Duncan Street to go to Naza. The blow staggered him, he felt surprised and confused and forgot himself and sat down on the wooden steps just outside the bedroom door. The pain ebbed. He had sweated through his shirt and the old black jacket. He saw his hat on the ground, it seemed far away. He felt he had not the strength to reach for it. He felt cold and there was a tingling sensation in his face and the back of his head. He hugged his knees as a sense of fear began to replace the confusion. The next lash took him across his back. A sharp burning pain that drove him to his feet, he turned to run back into the house just as the bedroom door slammed shut. In a frantic effort he grabbed the edge and tried to pull, that was when the first stone crashed into the side of the house. He bawled, but there was no sound. Turning, he saw the large white stone on the step, next to his foot, it had come from the stone bleach, a pile of boulders in the form of a square that was used by the household to whiten clothes upon in the blinding light of day. Another rock, bigger, just rose from the pile and struck him on the shin. He bawled and tried to scream and run. Something struck him hard across the face, spinning him about. He stumbled, fell, rose to flee as three, four, large white stones struck him hard on the arm and chest and leg.
The bleach was stoning him. The other one caught him on the jaw. He tasted blood and gasping spat out teeth. Several more stones struck him forcefully on the head, body, and face. He fell, and still the rain of stones continued, covering him, piling up about him and the wooden steps until the entire stone bleach had transferred itself to bury him beneath it, all heaped up very neatly on the side of his grandmother’s house. Then stillness. Several tiny white butterflies danced in pairs in the bright noon light above where the stone bleach had recently been."

"The track that led from his abode in the old La Fantaisie estate slave barracks to the estate cemetery, which was dominated by the ruined Gothic tomb of the Baron de Mallevault, was lit by the dappled sunlight of the early Corpus Christi morning.
“The boy turning out, eh, he give it to Ti-Pap good. All ah dem praying, saying chaplet, praying, to dis Orisha dat Saint. Is me who is Maît’, master, me, dey say I am malfacteur, the evildoer, the man with the powder, well dem ‘fraid powder! De boy he eh ‘fraid, he could manjé moun, eat people, kill dem dead.”
The boy, Naza, had indeed passed his first initiation into the society, Les Cochons Sans Poils; the pigs without hair. Tonight he would be a witness to another ritual of the Society, the waking of the Zombi savane, one who had been buried in the earth, having been made a zombi, is to be awakened, to be dispatched for a purpose.
The bonfire blazed up high, illuminating the huge samaans that crowded round the old slave cemetery, throwing about the grotesque shadows of the men who sat around it. Inside the tomb the boy had followed all the instructions given to him by his Maît’; he had licked and kissed the old man’s scaly crippled foot, his decrepit toes with their long black curling toenails in gratitude, with tears streaming down his face, washing those ancient feet.
He had hauled the coffin that contained the night’s main attraction into the middle of the crypt in the bowels of the tomb, there was just room for four or five of them and for him. He would perch in the now empty alcove that had previously contained a marble statue of Saint Ignacio López de Loyola to whom the Baron had been devoted.
Outside the men feasted, drank and celebrated the death of old Ti-Pap and the entering into their midsts of a new Cochon. 
“Fresh pork, eh Narcisse, the boy good too bad!” shouted the old man; “léfan té ka valé kalbas, pas li konnèt bonda-li.” Which for the benefit of the ignorant means: the elephant can swallow a calabash because it knows the size of its asshole.
“You train him, Zinga, you train him. But leh we go, we have work to do tonight, not so?” 
“Take care he bite you, eh, he is bite.”
“Yes, yes, these Cochons getting dronk on Cecil Marquis rum, they belly full a snake and lizard. Leh we go, leh we go.” 
“Help Zinga there, Zilet, before he break he neck in the tomb.”
Stumbling down the steep stair, they squeezed in as best they could; those who could not fit, and those who preferred the rum and what was left of the quenk and the macajuel stew, the iguana eggs and Congo peppers, were glad to stay outside. 
They had seen the corps cadavre come out of the box, bazodee with fright, he thought he was dead, he think this is hell, they all had stories of zombis who had dropped dead for true in fright, others who got out, got away and bolted into some white people garden party, his shroud buss up, all he big long toto outside. “You was there for that eh? You remember the night Muzumbo dead, they had the wake in San Fernando, you could remember, eh, eh?” 
The noise and excited talk was hardly audible down inside the crypt. In fact there was no excitement at all. The flambeau illuminated the scene that was dominated by the large white coffin around which the old man, Narcisse, Phillibert, Zilet and another called Ozie were closest. “This Shampwel, this society is called to order and come tonight to do the work of le Baron Samedi, lord and guardian of this graveyard,” intoned Narcisse, pouring rum on the coffin and on the ground all around. Ozie was beating a syncopated rhythm on a small drum. The old man raised himself up, there was no pain in his twisted legs, his frame, big, strong still, threw a massive shadow on the wall, partly covering the alcove in which the boy, Naza, crouched.
“Here, put this on, tie it on your face, le cadavre full of datura and dead crapaud powder.” He passed the red satin squares around, then struck a match into an old chamber pot which immediately blazed with several small explosions, filling the crypt with black smoke. “Now take this.” He passed around a rum bottle filled with a thick oily substance that smelled of asafoetida and tar. “Rub it, rub it, on you arm, now take the fire.” With that he plunged his hands into the flaming pot and passed the fire from his hands to the hands held out by the others. For a brief moment they all appeared to be ablaze as the leaping flames caught their shirts and beards. In a frenzy they slapped each other to out the fire, laughing hysterically, screaming, shouting “Vini, Samedi, vini, vini gadé, ou, serviteur!” The little drum beating, beating louder and louder. 
At a point considered appropriate, the old man with the aid of Phillibert prized open the coffin to size the corps cadavre by the shoulders, to rise him up into the night, to bring him to the prison of his new condition. For a brief second, the old man did see the staring eyes open in the coal-black face of the man who was once known as Saint Jacques. The next second, the body sat up straight, and grabbed him by the throat like a vice. 
Men screamed, Narcisse and Phillibert tried to prize open the hand, the po capsized, sending the flaming liquid to the ground, towards them, those who could make the stairs, scrambled up, others aflame, tried to, the coffin fell over, taking the old man and his killer to ground, where they fought like beast. The coffin, now on fire with the flammable liquid, burned upon them where they were. Then, they lay still, quiet, they were both dead. 
The boy, Naza, had seen it all. Singed like a chicken, his hair, eyebrows and clothes burnt and in rags, he scrambled down from his perch and out of the tomb. The others had fled, howling, laughing, into the pitch-black, wooded hillside above La Fantaisie Road. What a story."


ISBN 978-976-8054-87-6
Language: English/Patois
160 pages, softcover & hardcover
Dimensions: ca. 5 x 8"

Softcover available on amazon.com and barnesandnoble.com
Hardcover available on amazon.com and barnesandnoble.com


From our readers:
"The swirling beauty of this wind-driven collection of lives moving in one part of the universe tells us all, no matter what:  to be human is to be storied in narratives that sing to the tune of many unseen and as well seen forces." (Prof. John Nunley, USA)


"Love the mix of historical fact and fiction.Left me wanting to know more stories about the characters and their lives.Thanks Mr Besson looking forward to your next novel." (Dr. Adele L.C. Springer)

"This brilliant folktale recounts three generations of strong women who were part of the Afro-French Creole culture of Trinidad as it evolved in the nineteenth century.  Besson’s beautiful style of writing captures the intertwining of ethnic backgrounds, class, politics, language, religion, and magic.  The readers are taken through an intense struggle between generous goodwill and dreadful evil.  Nightmarish events contrast with portrayals of luminous personalities and romance. Besson draws from his own family’s history and reminiscences, years of scholarship, and tropical imagination to produce a fascinating narrative." (From Barbara Mauldin, Curator of Latin American Folk Art, Museum of International Folk Art, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA)


"Your prose is seductive and intoxicating.  It reminded me a lot of Garcia Marquez, especially in Love in the Time of Cholera. I was swept away. I also very much appreciated and loved the details you provided about Trinidad's history.  I learned so much from reading your novel.  It was also good to recognize some things I thought I had forgotten and to make connections to things I had not linked together.  Thank you very much.  Again, congratulations." (From Elizabeth Nunez, Distinguished Professor of English at Hunter College, City University of New York, and an award-winning author)


"Besson's portrait of 19th century Trinidad is that of a master painter, and the smells, sights and sounds of that bygone era are vividly brought to life." (Julien Neaves, "What Lies in the 'Govi'", Trinidad Express 27 July 2011)


Press reviews:

Gerard Besson’s Govi
by MARION O'CALLAGHAN  
(published in "Trinidad and Tobago Newsday", August 15, 2011)


It is difficult to classify Gérard Besson’s The Voice in the Govi. The author presents it as fiction. It turns out to be also the story of his “ancestors”, as told to him and as imagined by him. The Govi is fiction. The real story is sealed in a clay pot from Africa. This pot is placed within an elaborate outer jar from Europe. The underlying theme of the book is the mixing of Africa and France in the Caribbean. The voices of African ancestors are within the clay pot. “… it was symbolic of past existences”, writes Besson, “… the accumulated history of her own life – her mother’s, her grandmother’s, even her great grandmother’s, as well as intimations of her people’s experiences through times long past.” But this is not African. It is myth and oral history which transmits the “people’s experiences through time.”
Africa or Europe 
Ancestors reward, punish and sometimes warn family and clan. There is not the idea of “essence” nor of some unconscious national “memory”. Besson’s “…intimations of her people’s experiences through times long past” come from Europe and particularly Europe of the 1920’s and 1930’s. It was adopted by the Austrian psychoanalyst Jung and was the basis for his Nazi sympathies. It is associated with Wagner’s culture “Masters” of Germany linked to Bayreuth. It accounts for Hitler’s love of Wagner’s music. Further in the book Besson speaks of the Orishas. These are largely New Age interpretations of African religion. They would not have existed at the time of which Gérard Besson writes. Nor would “poisoning” be part of, say, Congolese witchcraft. Poisoning penetrates Central Africa from West Africa probably with the trade in slaves.
Is this all, or is the book itself better seen as the Trinidad and Tobago “branch” of the new vogue in the neo-romantic strand of vampire books? In this new vogue the Bennett sisters of Jane Austen become the killers of zombies. “Have zombies therefore replaced vampires?” asks Alain Beuve-Méry in Le Monde of October 2009. Well, they are the “undead” in Besson.

Neo-Romanticism 
The elaborate jar may also be integrated into the neo-romanticism of the 18th and 19th century idea of Europe and particularly of its aristocracy. “Louis Rémy wore pastel-coloured silk shirts… carried a rapier with a ruby set into a golden shell on its hilt, sported the going-out-of-style plus fours of dark green velvet with cream hose, black patent leather shoes with silver buckles…” This is neo-romanticism in the tradition of Watteau and Marie-Antoinette frolicking as a Shepherdess.
The elaborate jar is decorated with a picture of Our Lady as Queen. Was this meant to underline the relationship of French Monarchists to the Catholic Church? For part of Gérard Besson’s imagination is that slave revolt in Santo Domingue (Haiti) from which French monarchists and slave owners fled to Port-of-Spain, then under Spanish rule. “…The uprising, the murder, the destruction, the commencement of the ancestress of all Caribbean Revolutions.” It was the ancestress of Fédon’s revolt in Grenada with “…the madness of the slaves, the aristocrats begging for their lives…The body of bloody men surging by, a blonde baby spiked through, waving before them as a banner for the damned…”

Bread and Wine 
It is this “reality” which spawns one of Besson’s most remarkable stories. It is the “profane and blasphemous ceremony” held four times a year when the Grand Judge of a secret society of Blacks holds out bread and wine. He declares that “…the bread you are eating is the white man’s flesh; the wine you are drinking is the white man’s blood.” The congregation of Blacks reply: “Remember Santo Domingo.” This is easily traced. It is from the anti-Jewish blood stories of the 13th and 14th centuries. Jewish feasts were rumoured to be a blasphemous Eucharist and to often include the sacrificial death of a Christian child. The rumours were usually the forerunner of anti-Jewish pogroms. In general, these stories did not cross the Atlantic to Trinidad. The nearest to them, the Good Friday Bobolee, is beaten as a fool with none of the racist trimmings of Europe.
If it is true that the story of a bread and wine affair circulated, this would indicate that, at the time, Blacks were assimilated to Jews and Free Masons, the enemies of the Middle Ages. With the Santo Domingo revolution there is the problem of dates. In 1789 there was the French revolution.
The Santo Domingo revolution led to by Toussaint L’Ouverture is a continuation of this. In February 1794 the French Revolutionary Council declared the abolition of slavery. It is Napoleon’s attempt to re-establish slavery in 1802 which led to a fierce resistance, to the Republic of Haiti and its loss to France.
It is, however, in the “plaçage” relationship that the stereotypes of race and of class change the nature of the novel. But that for next week.

Besson, history and folklore
by MARION O'CALLAGHAN 
(published in Trinidad Newsday, Monday, August 22 2011)
If you wish to read some of our “Patois” sayings, read Gérard A Besson’s The Voice in the Govi. “When a person has known another in the daytime, he does not need a candle to recognise him at night.” Or, “What business has a rose in Jacques’ bundle of weed?”
The patois sayings introduce chapters and hint at the nature of characters. Patois is also within the text, reminding us that Patois, or “Creole”, continued to be spoken in some rural areas long after French had disappeared.
Or, reminding us that the first calypsos were in Patois. Unfortunately conversations in Patois introduce another source of complexity within The Voice of the Govi. This adds to the difficulty of following a story already fragmented between the living, the dead and the undead or, between myth and reality, fiction and biography.

Those Cedulas 
Gerard Besson makes no secret of what and who constitutes Trinidad for him. It is the “Cedulas” arriving with the 1783 decision of Charles II of Spain to accept St Laurent’s scheme. This granted land and encouraged free Catholic immigrants into Trinidad. Besson wipes off as non-existent, Trini history before the Cedulas. This is a pity. It was the history of the failed Dutch attempt in 1610 to introduce slaves and the catastrophe of most of the 18th century which accounts for the position of French settlers in the economy of the country. In 1699 was the Amerindian revolt, the Arena massacre and the tragedy of Toco.
The collective Toco suicide is mentioned, but as part of folklore, Soucouyants and ghost stories. In 1723 there is the first major failure of cocoa. It is followed by the granting of a trade monopoly to a Caracas company, further ruining Trini Spanish settlers. It is in this vacuum that the Cedulas arrive.
For Besson, Trini history is the continuation of French history and of French settler history in Santo Domingo (Haiti), Martinique and Guadeloupe. This is not totally false. The fear which some French writers have noted underlies “race” conflict in Guadeloupe and Martinique, is diluted in Trinidad but not totally absent. Rather, it is displaced, to become a fear of African and sometimes Indian religions as prompted by the Devil.
Unfortunately, Besson sometimes mixes up his history. Victor Hugues, whom Besson calls “a republican terrorist”, arrested, massacred and seized the property of those he considered Royalist in Guadeloupe.
It was not in Martinique. French in Martinique joined with the British forces to maintain slaves and plantations. It is this sense of the British as “protectors” which possibly accounts for the relative ease with which British colonialism proceeded in Trinidad. Conflict was over what was seen as undermining Catholic rights.
These Catholic rights included rights of women to keep their property after marriage and the right of illegitimate children to inherit from their father. They could be called “plaçage” rights. It is these which introduce a shade ranking rather than the Black and White of the USA. None of this emerges in The Voice in the Govi.

Male and Female 
Besson insists that African religion was maintained. However, African religion disconnected from the structure of power within a community, reads like superstition.
In Besson’s The Voice in the Govi, it is obeah, spirit possession, zombies and the undead which emerge as African. We know, however, that the incidence of obeah or witchcraft is linked to social crises that seem politically unmanageable.
Those seen as “witches” are not anyone; they are strangers, the elderly, or those at the margins of society. Spirit possession may be used in order to legitimise a new “tribal” unity (South Sudan), as a method of legal enquiry (Nigeria), or as a call to revolt (Zimbabwe), among other uses.
Folklore (and stereotype) is reflected in the presentation of men and of women. In The Voice in the Govi, Eugenie has a “beautiful Black woman’s backside”. At seventeen and arrived in Martinique, she quickly becomes the plaything of a retired Spanish admiral. As he lay dying, he hands her over to his young protégé, Baron de Montalembert.
White women rarely enter the story. Black men do. There was Naza “with powers”.
“He was perceived … as the inheritor of an antique and long enduring evil that harked back in time to slavery days, perhaps before.” It is Naza who inflicts poisons, false deaths and zombies.
Yes, there is the Soucouyant, who is linked to an “old white woman”, but this is at the end of the story.
These stereotypes of race are not Besson’s. They have existed and continue to structure our society. They introduce fixed attributes of race, of evil and of sex. Behind this is the area of race and its use in the symbolic construction of good and evil.


Resurrecting the Soucouyant 
by Simon Lee
(published in the Trinidad Guardian, 22 December 2012)

Jerry Besson has worn many hats in an extensive career straddling media, advertising, local and Caribbean history. I suspect that the man who lives in a house called ‘Tall Stories’ in the Cascade hills, will be more than a little pleased with his latest venture, a novella ‘The Voice in the Govi’, which, better late than never, places him in the ranks of fiction writers.
Finally Besson’s predilection for weaving never-ending extempo tales, synthesizing his store of oral histories, family anecdotage and gems of recondite local history, has found its way onto the page. The result is a combination of a ‘ripping good yarn’ (in its literal sense, as several unfortunate characters in the book lose their skins to a ferocious soucouyant), one of the best tales of the supernatural produced in the Anglophone Caribbean since Mittelholzer’s ‘My Bones and My Flute’ and a sepia-tinted narrative crammed with historical personages, exuberant  baroque detail and irreverent humour.
In terms of historicity Besson must be congratulated for highlighting the links between Trinidad and Haiti, which only Bridget Brereton has paid any attention to previously. A long-time student and aficionado of ‘Afro- French Creole culture’, Besson not only provides well-researched biographical detail on figures like the Counts de Lopinot and Montalambert, but more significantly for his supernatural purposes, some new insights and suggestions on the connections between Haitian Vodou and Trinidadian Shango and Orisha worship.
The ripping yarn gets off to a suitably spine tingling start with the best account of zombification since Rene Depestre’s ‘Hadriana en toutes mes reves’. There is definitely an element of tongue-in-cheek scarification and ‘tief head’ involved here. Besson suggests that it’s possible that among the Haitian slaves who relocated here with their masters at the end of the eighteenth century, there may well have been a few experts in the techniques of producing ‘the living dead’. We know that poisoning was a strategy of resistance employed by slaves in Saint Domingue and Trinidad, and that zombification requires the same kind of specialized knowledge; so it’s eminently possible that even in postmodern Trinidad, zombis may be plying their melancholy trade!
 The Voice of the Govi belongs to the genre of oraliture or orality, popularized by the Martiniquan Creolist writers Patrick Chamoiseau and Rafael Confiant, both of whose work can be viewed as a project to record a rapidly disappearing oral tradition. Besson chooses as his narrator his mother, who tells the story from the perspective of a young girl, fascinated by the tales of an elderly aunt, who occupies a room in her Belmont family home.
The whole story is really an elaboration on the metaphor of the govi itself: a receptacle of ancestral spirits represented by a multi-generational collection of ritual objects which’ contained in symbolic manner, the accumulated history of her own life and her ancestors…a careful cultivation to ensure nothing from life’s experience became lost…it was the method by which her people retrieved and incorporated the best of past lessons and experiences into the present and as such kept the past as progress made’ (14-15)
In writing his Creole tale of mystery, horror and suspense, Besson has drawn deep from his own govi and many years of injecting creativity into corporate advertising campaigns. Sex, subliminally or right in your face, has and will always be a major seller, closely followed by violence and humour.  Like an alchemist or a quimboiseur he mixes all these three vital ingredients into his text, along with several of his own concerns – the French gentry whose younger sons came to the Antilles seeking their fortunes and who gave birth to the gens de couleur; the meeting of mediaeval European witchcraft and African magic; the Creole revolutions in Haiti, Guadeloupe, St Lucia and Grenada which were ignited by Enlightenment ideas, Jacobin bloodbaths and refusal to accept enslavement.
While one of Besson’s alter egos may well be a benevolent minor French aristocrat with encyclopaedic interests, this one cannot override his delight in subverting these pretensions or even offending notions of Euro respectability, when juxtaposed with supposed Creole sensuality and sexuality. The main protagonist La Sirene Rosa enjoys a long lesbian relationship with her schoolfriend Eugenie Amelie, herself a product of the practice of plaçage, or those ‘left hand’ coomon-law marriages ‘in which European men of substance and women of colour entered into long term relationships which would over time produce a beautiful race.’ (p 14) One of La Rosa’s French ancestors, the Count de Mole, becomes the willing serviteur of his enslaved Vodou mistress, an embodiment of the powerful loa Erzulie Freda, goddess of love,: ‘He held her feet as she sat enthroned in his lap; she placed upon him the iron chains of slavery, and in so doing enslaved her master.’ (p 28)
Without giving away any of the details of the gripping pore and hair raising finale to this ripping yarn, suffice it to say that Besson has added to his already impressive re-assembling of Creole oral and documented history in typical rhizomic fashion. He records and invents not only from the bottom up, but sideways too, presenting us with a govi of Afro-French Creole culture, in the process preserving for future generations ‘cultural memory…lost through emigration and immigration, as well as being increasingly eclipsed by other realities.’

Monday, January 17, 2011

"Western Isles of Trinidad"

By Fr. Anthony de Verteuil

Paria Publishing is pleased to announce a forthcoming publication in our series "Paria Classics", which features re-publications of seminal works about the history of Trinidad and Tobago.

Fr. Anthony de Verteuil, a well-known author about Trinidad's history with a large number of titles published over several decades, wrote this charming and interesting book about "Down the Islands". The small and tiny mountaintops that peep out of the ocean between Trinidad's westernmost tip and Venezuela's Paria peninsula have traditionally been the place for weekend homes of many of the country's old families, and generations of children virtually grew up there, learning about the sea and about boats. But there is more to the history of the Western Isles: historical battles were fought between them, pirates hid their loot there in sheltered coves, and the largest centipedes ever beheld by mankind live in their undergrowth!

ISBN: 978-976-9500-85-3
First published in 2002. Revised in 2005. Third Printing 2011.
Size: 8.5 x 11", Hardcover, fully illustrated in black & white
286 pages
Available on amazon.com and barnesandnoble.com

Monday, November 1, 2010

Adventure Stories from the Caribbean


Andy Campbell's third fantastic children's story book — better than ever!

Why are homing pigeons so vital to have on board when going on a family outing? Why should old men owning museums never be underestimated by art thieves? And why should one be careful when flying a monster kite on a windy day? Andy Campbell's answers to these questions make exciting, thrilling, delightful reading (or reading aloud). This book, the third in Andy's series of adventurous and often hair-raisingly suspenseful stories for and about children in the Caribbean, is fabulously illustrated by Trinidadian up-and-coming illustrator Ryan James. And because Andy is a retired pilot, there is always the thrill of flying involved somewhere in his stories ... and if it's only tribal blow-darts whirring about in the night!

7 x 10", 112 pages in colour, softcover
Illustrations by Ryan James
ISBN 976-8054-84-5

Andy Campbell, a retired BWIA pilot, and is a Trinidadian raconteur like no-one else. This summer, Paria Publishing's intern Kelsea actually asked us: "Can I stop working now and finish reading these stories?" Consider yourself warned—it's a 'no-can-put-down' book!

By the same author:
Stories from the Cockpit
Three Scary Stories

Available on amazon.com and barnesandnoble.com


Producer Alice Besson of Paria Publishing with pushlisher / author Andy Campbell at the 2010 booklaunch of "Adventure Stories from the Caribbean".

Monday, June 21, 2010

The Book of Trinidad

by Gerard A. Besson and Bridget Brereton

The long-awaited republication of the Trinidad classic "The Book of Trinidad" is finally here! With this book, we celebrate our 30th company anniversary in 2011.

“We must remember… and we must remember everything.”
– Gerard Besson

The Book of Trinidad, a perennial favourite with Trinidadians all over the world, is an eclectic mix of travelogues, recipes, newspaper reports, official records, the seminal work of historians and, perhaps more importantly, the oral traditions of the very old whose memories link back to the turn of the century. Fully illustrated with rare pictures from a wide range of sources, The Book of Trinidad has sold thousands of copies since its first publication in 1986.
The history of beautiful Trinidad is a relatively short but multi-faceted one in comparison to its neighbouring islands in the Caribbean. The Book of Trinidad travels through centuries of Trinidad’s life, exposing an experience in which the changing of seasons was the only constant in an otherwise timeless world.
The remarkable thing in the development of Trinidad has been the make-up of its population. Literally, people from all over the world found a home in the island by virtue of their Catholicism or other considerations. Truly antique strains, such as the Rada from West Africa and Maronite Christians from the Ottoman Empire, Brahmins from India, French aristocrats, Corsican revolutionaries, Portuguese converted to Protestanism from Madeira, Chinese peasants, liberated Africans, and Shiite Muslims who have continued to the present to celebrate Muharrum (Hosay) were all poured into the mould of British colonialism and stamped by the prejudices of the time. Writers Bridget Brereton and Gerard Besson bring together the people of Trinidad by commemorating the memory of shared experiences among this plethora of cultures in the development of our beloved country.
Brereton and Besson’s collaboration in The Book of Trinidad draws together the collective experience of the nation’s people to put together the colourful mosaic that is, in truth, our national patrimony.

Bridget Brereton was a Professor of History and the Head of the History department at the University of the West Indies’ St. Augustine campus. She has served on several occasions as the Principal of the University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad.

Gerard A. Besson is a publisher, writer and historian. He is the founder of Paria Publishing, a company that has produced around 100 titles in the field of history and folklore. In 2007, he was the recipient of the Hummingbird Medal (Gold) for Heritage Preservation and Promotion. 



Hardcover: 550 pages
Language: English
ISBN: 978-9768054364
Dimensions: 11 x 8.5 x 1.2 inches



Available on amazon.com and barnesandnoble.com

From our Readers:
"...just wanted to drop a quick note to let you know that I am throughly enjoying reading this book.  It has now become my travel companion, especially during the long ferry waits to and from  the little coastal town where I live." (from Canada)

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

The Cult of the Will

by Gerard A. Besson

This study deals with the complex issues of race, history and politics in Caribbean society.

In its first part, “François Besson”, it examines the fortunes of a French creole family between the mid-18th and early 20th centuries, and describes their experiences against the backdrop of the social and political conflicts occasioned by the excesses of plantation slavery and the upheavals of the French revolution. It looks at Julien Fédon’s revolution of 1795 in Grenada, examines  the nature of the relationship between master and slave, the children of these unions, and the deadly divisions that were at times engendered as a result of the custom of the plaçage (concubinage), causing ‘victors’ or ‘victims’ of “The Cult of the Will” to emerge; thus influencing at times the destiny of these islands. The second part of the book, “Eric  Williams”, studies the manner in which an historian-turned-politician, tragically afflicted by “The Cult of the Will” and perhaps convinced that history is destiny, used, in Trinidad and Tobago, the politics of inherited guilt and inherited victimhood to create scapegoats in an attempt to assuage his “Inward Hunger”, while making clever use of  ‘Black Nationalism’ that was becoming popular in the 1950s.
Revisionist in its scope, this book undertakes to change our understanding of the past, so that we may create a more useful future. It examines the points in time when the historical narratives of the country changed, occasioned by a shift in moral values, bringing about a different interpretation of its history. It ponders the question whether the presidency of Barack Obama may mark the end of the Eric Williams narrative of victimhood, scapegoating and irresponsibility as expressed in its politics, and herald the start of a new, New World narrative endowed with empowerment and responsibility.


“Your thesis comes across as logical, though speculative at times, but put together with the deprivations he  (Eric Williams) admittedly experienced at Oxford and at the Caribbean Commission, the victimhood narrative is plausible, and indeed has become disruptive of this country’s civility, democracy and ethnic harmony . . . You have created a serious challenge to orthodoxy. You have broken up quite a few myths, and in fact forcefully argued how the passion for psychic compensation and restoration by Williams has led to an intensely institutionalized culture of victimhood. A victimhood now challenged by Obama, a challenge which not only shifts the paradigm but holds better promise for spiritual growth and the shaping of a common humanity.”
Professor Emeritus Ramesh Deosaran


Gerard A. Besson is a publisher, writer and historian who specialises in the history of Trinidad and Tobago and has worked in all media in a career that has spanned four decades. In 2007, he was awarded the Hummingbird Medal (Gold) for Heritage Preservation and Promotion, and in 2015, an Honorary Doctorate from the University of the West Indies.

ISBN 978-9-7680548-21
286 pages
illustrated in full colour throughout
Softcover
7 x 10"

Available on amazon.com and barnesandnoble.com


Reviews in the Trinidad and Tobago Press:



How Rookery Nook Came To Be Named
by Prof. Brinsley Samaroo 
(published in the Trinidad Guardian, 13 June 2010)

Before reading this book, one needs to familiarise oneself with three concepts that continuously inform the writing. These are “the narrative,” “plaçage” and “the cult of the will.” These concepts become clear by the time one reaches the second part of the book, but they should have been explained at the beginning. “Narrative” in this text is not mere narration; it is not just a recounting of the French Creole and the Afro-French Creole past, but rather the spin that is put to that recalling. Narrative here means who is included and who is excluded, and the book deals at length with the consequences of that deliberately-created narrative. It is the argument of this book that Eric Williams, the historian, tailored his narrative to exclude or underplay the role of major contributions to the creation of Trinbago.
“Plaçage” refers to the high incidence of concubinage practised by European merchants, planters, military men, civil officials and the motley crowd of adventurers who came to this side of the water where European women were in very short supply, and took full advantage of slave women over whom they had total control. Later on, they pounced on the mixed-race, coloured women produced by these first encounters. Quite often, these coloured offspring were invited to share their fathers’ houses alongside his legitimate children, to be cared for by the lawful wife. There was little effort to hide placage. Besson recounts the case of John Nicholas Boissiere, who had married a woman of colour with whom he had several children, living in a posh home opposite his father’s mansion at Champs Elysées in Maraval.
In this abode, his outside, plaçage children also lived, and when some local wags commented on the number of crows (blacks) who lived in this rookery, his response was to name the residence “Rookery Nook,” which name the place proudly bears to this day. The third term that requires explanation is “the cult of the will,” which derives from the practice of plaçage. In the tangled history of the Caribbean, where paternity was often disputed, the offspring of these macho men faced an uncertain future. The will became a major determinant of either a good start in life or the prospect of abandonment. Those who were favourably treated in the will could go on to live a comfortable life, but those who were not had to paddle their own canoe in a society where skin colour and/or the kind of hair were major criteria of social and economic mobility.
Even so, being included in the will did not mean that benefits could be reaped. Besson argues that Eric Williams’ forebears, coming from this Afro-French Creole stream, were twice denied benefits that should have accrued to them by ancestors who did not consider them deserving of any patrimony. Such deprivation forced Eric’s parents into a penurious living, and this impacted negatively on the young man. Williams, the historian, made frequent references to his parents’ strained circumstances, and this sense of victimhood became a major feature of his writing, as well as his political philosophy. The cult of the will, therefore, which determined who benefited and who did not, forms a major theme of Bessons’ work. The book is divided into two parts. Part one is a carefully-gathered genealogy in which the saga of the Besson dynasty is painstakingly traced, beginning 1,000 years ago with the establishment of a church at Besson in the Auvergne region in France.
The research is thorough; the author was able to locate authentic documents in France, in England and in Grenada, and to organise this diverse material into a coherent narrative. He gives reasons for the Bessons’ migration from France to the Caribbean. In the wake of the French Revolution, Royalists fled to Santo Domingo and to the southern Caribbean, particularly to Grenada. Under the Cedula of Population (1783), hundreds of French settlers migrated to a sparsely-settled Trinidad. François Besson was one of these, and in 1788 he received a grant of 256 acres in South Naparima. Within a few years, he was able to acquire La Romaine, La Fortunée and Bellevue (at Guapo) where, with his many slaves, he prospered. Buoyed up by this mini-empire, François moved north to Port-of-Spain, acquiring a number of prime properties, including one at Besson Street, where his descendants lived, up to the 1920s.
This prosperity continued until the second half of the 19th century, when the depression of the sugar industry hit the French Creoles hard. Some lost their properties or had to sell cheaply to the English investors, and others went into the cocoa industry. The first part of the book contains much detailed information on the fortunes of the French and French Creole settlers and the accompanying miscegenation, which spawned the Afro-French Creole segment. It tells of their spreading influence everywhere, even as far as Mayaro. It is a micro-study that complements the exacting macro-studies, providing hard evidence that supplements the general, known framework. Many of the pictures are published for the first time, and these are embellished by the family trees that can be of use for people whose ancestry derives from the French Creole input.
The copies of wills that form the appendices are treasure troves of information. These wills emphasise the importance of the cult of the will. The second part of the book, one suspects, will be of major interest to most readers. For it is in this section that Besson’s thesis is expostulated. He sees an aggressive streak in the male offspring of plaçage, evident, for example, in the mixed-race Grenadian revolutionary Fedon, who led a bitterly-fought uprising against European domination in Grenada in 1795. That rebellious spirit is later transferred to Trinidad, and is manifested in the rise of a number of people of colour who rise to positions of eminence here. Eric Williams, as a 20th-century descendant of that Afro-French Creole matrix, falls within that same tradition.
As a student in England, he came under the influence of the black nationalist CLR James, who impressed on his mind that revolutionary tendency in the leaders of the Haitian revolution, so passionately espoused in James’ The Black Jacobins. Besson believes that Williams combined these elements of thought with his own personal sense of victimhood, evidenced by his family’s excision from the cult of the will, to create an ideology based on righting the wrongs visited upon Caribbean people. Thus, when he gave us the slogan, “Massa Day Done,” he was indicating that all of the remaining descendants of the Europeans must take note of the new reality. The term “French Creole” now meant all persons of European descent, without regard to their actual ancestry. By the same token, Besson argues, East Indians were no more than marginal in Williams’ calculation.
For this reason, they are virtually excluded from the Eric Williams narrative. They are no more than peripheral to the story of our development. This theme, the major thesis of The Cult of the Will, is, to say the least, highly-controversial, and will no doubt be the subject of intense scrutiny over the next few decades. It is a major addition to the Williams debate, not to be dismissed lightly. So what does one make of the book as a whole? The first part is a compendium of carefully-gathered information, detailing a major hitherto unwritten dimension of our history. The cultural and economic contributions of the French Creole and Afro-French Creole community is detailed, and we learn much of their social life and interactions with the larger society.
This useful introduction then leads us into the second part, which deals with Williams’ transference of his own historical hurt into his writing of history and into his practice of politics. Because of the decisive role of politics in small societies such as ours, that assertion of personal pain into the business of governance has had damaging consequences on our efforts to create unity and productivity out of our diversity. The book argues that diversity was used to create division rather than harmony. The Cult of the Will now seeks to add that broad group who are called French Creole into the discourse, so that there can be greater balance in the chronicle of our nation. The book is, therefore, a welcome addition to the literature of development, and must now be included in our national dialogue.








by Prof. John Gaffar La Guerre 
(published in Newsday, 25 July 2010)

The Cult of the Will by Gerard Besson is a most welcome, timely and useful book at this juncture of our history, for it comes at a time when epochal and dramatic changes are taking place ushering in, it seems, yet another ‘narrative’ in the unfolding development of Trinidad and Tobago, as groups supersede one another as dominant forces in the evolution of the society and state.
The main concern of the book is to debunk a ‘narrative’ in which the European-descended, or those appearing that way – Trinidadians all – were made scapegoats for injustices of the past by the politics of the Williams ‘narrative’.
Besson writes, “The notion of inherited guilt is, however, fundamentally wrong, morally unjustified and distinctly unscientific. Collective guilt is a basic fallacy of Marxism, which denies the individual of importance, only seeing him or her as a member of a class.
It also seeks to condone racism, and to convey the notion that it is alright to alienate Indians and hate white people in general and French Creoles in particular.” (p234)
Besson’s book is accordingly an exploration of the progression and trajectory of race relations from the time of the conquest, through early colonisation and into independence.
It thus follows on earlier explorations in the French Caribbean by Kovats-Beaulieu, in her work Les Blancs Crèoles de la Martinique, Souquet-Basiege in his work Le Prèjuge de Race aux Antilles Franáaise, Brereton in the case of Trinidad in her book “Race Relations in Trinidad” as well as Maingot’s thesis on the French creoles.
Besson’s book, however, is the first by a local white in recent times to speak out and comment directly on the various ‘narratives’ on offer over the years. Clearly the time for assessment has come and his book must accordingly be read as a contribution to that assessment.
Apart from Fr de Verteuil and Mrs Franco, the persons who are perceived as whites have been conspicuously absent from the debates on race relations over the years.
It is possible that the treatment of Albert Gomes in and after 1956, or that of the McArthys at Sangre Grande during the incidents of 1970, induced them to retreat into near oblivion.
Yet as every student will understand, race relations are essentially about tribalism and there is a tendency for all tribes to make scapegoats of others.
This is essentially a defence mechanism by one group against the other. It is now commonplace to recognise that no race or tribe has a monopoly of virtue and that all groups will have their heroes and their villains. Nor is it fair to judge the actions of a particular century by standardising the values of the 20th or 21st. Life is universally regarded as morally sacred but different cultures have displayed differing treatment of life over the centuries.
The Cult of the Will, more importantly, shows how inheritance of property plays an important role in keeping families together, and also how the shortage of European women, particularly among the French, led to mÈtissage and the rise of a mulatto class.
That class was to play an important role in the various challenges to the social and political order over the years. Besson has also enlightened us on the extent to which the early French settler class originated from Grenada and the extent to which the development of the cocoa industry depended on them. They too were some of the early pioneers in the economic development of Trinidad and Tobago. Indeed it is well to recall that it was French, British and Spanish capital along with Amerindian, African and Indian labour that developed Trinidad and Tobago.
Yet the French, like the African, Indian and other groups, encountered their share of discrimination. Then as now there was a pecking order.
The English discriminated against the French and both discriminated against the Indians and Africans. Africans discriminated against Indians who reciprocated in their own way.
The house slave discriminated against the field slave, free against unfree, large slave owners against petit blancs. Colonial society clearly had its subtleties and various gradations of discrimination.
As the Trinidadian sociologist Braithwaite reminded us in his pioneering work in Social Stratification in Trinidad and Tobago, it was this subtle discrimination, based on the values of colour and status, which held the society together.
Indeed some of the lasting legacies of colonial rule was the enthronement of colour and status.
White slave owners discriminated against black slave owners. Colour became an addiction that was impossible to eradicate. It ensnared all, even the advocates of Black Power who showed a preference for lighter skins. Some of the discrimination to which Besson points was inherent in the system of colonial rule, based as it was on superordination and subordination.
The Indians who came to Trinidad were already prepared for some of these distinctions by their experiences of caste in India. Besson, however, recognises that some of the more perceptive critics of the Williams “narrative” were themselves African-descended, like Laurence, Rohlehr and Goveia. That “narrative” could also be seen, not as a failure to inherit, but as the behaviour of the “marginal personality”.
Dickie-Clark has employed this concept drawn from psychology to illuminate the behaviour of a number of challengers to existing social and political orders. According to Dickie-Clark, the “marginal man” or “marginal personality”, is one who is never properly integrated within a culture or a society.
They are persons who face rejection by one group or another.
Thus Jews, half-castes, mulattoes and other minority groups are prone to radical behaviour, because psychic integration is impossible for them.
Thus, like “Mohamet’s coffin”, they remain suspended in mid-air, prone to move in one way or the other, or to take in at short notice. Williams clearly falls within this category as the various biographical studies so far make clear. Plural societies tend to produce such types.
Besson is rightly concerned with the legacy of the Williams era and its “narrative”. For Besson, it has bequeathed us the”gimme gimme” and dependency syndromes. It must be recalled, however, that slavery also produced a dependency syndrome.
The master was required to provide appropriate accommodation, meet medical expenses and provide provision grounds and holidays. Indentureship continued the tradition, so that the Williams’ contribution was just one factor.
The party system of government also has a role to play as well as ideologies from abroad. As parties compete for votes they tend to out-promise each other.
The Williams narrative and accompanying policies did have its positive as well as negative side, and Besson does acknowledge some of them with regard to the private sector. As for scapegoats, this was the favourite pastime of most colonial politicians.
In Africa, the Caribbean and elsewhere the politicians begged for power from their colonial masters. Nkrumah urged his followers “Seek ye first the political kingdom and all other things will be added unto you”. To achieve power they could not put blame where it rightly lay.
So external and phantom enemies had to be constructed.
As Fanon clearly argued, during the early 60s the nationalists with their cries of redemption, statehood and racism merely wanted to step in the settlers’ shoes and relax in the verandahs of their bungalows.
Nor must we forget that Singapore and Hong Kong at one time were colonies of Britain, and that China was also one time a colony of Japan. Politicians in their thirst for power recognised that race was a powerful weapon because it appealed to a very basic ingredient of identity.
This is why in the whole of the Caribbean it is employed largely in Trinidad and Guyana for political traction.
Williams or his handlers used it where they did because it made political capital at the time. It is true that Williams was preoccupied with slavery and became a slave of slavery. Yet this is the curse of those who do serious PhDs on social and political topics.
They become colonised by their theses and spend the rest of their lives delving deeper and deeper on their chosen topic.
The idea of inheritance is nevertheless a useful construct by which to understand the changing nature of race relations in Trinidad and Tobago.
Besson has undoubtedly written a useful book.
It is to be hoped that it will encourage others who now remain in self-imposed exile to have their say and illuminate our history, which is after all about the history of all the groups and persons who have contributed to the development of Trinidad and Tobago.


"Eric Williams revisited"
by Prof. Selwyn Ryan 
(published in the Trinidad Express 4 July 2010)

It is perhaps a coincidence that the publication of Gerard Besson's controversial book, The Cult of the Will, should occur at the same time as the defeat of the People's National Movement (PNM) in the recently concluded general elections. The book is also being outdoored at a time—Friday 9—when the Eric Williams Memorial Lecture is scheduled to be delivered at the Central Bank. One of the basic arguments of the book is that Eric Williams and the PNM are "dead" or, if not, deserve to be.
The book consists of two basic parts. The first deals with rise and fall of the family of Francois Besson to which the author belongs. That family portrait is however not a vain exercise. Drawing on a wealth of documentary data, including wills, Besson fashions a tapestry of the black and white French creole community in Grenada and later in Trinidad from which one learns a great deal.
The second part of the book deals, inter alia, with wills and Williams, and argues that wills had a lot to do with who got what in Trinidad's racially stratified society. It argues further that two wills in particular, involving Eric Williams and his white forbears, had a significant impact on the post independence politics of Trinidad and Tobago.
Our analysis is confined to three of the books main arguments. The first is that Eric Williams and his intellectual patron, CLR James, wilfully and deliberately conspired to produce a contrived account of the British anti-slavery movement which Williams misused for political purposes. According to Besson, a significant aspect of the narrative, much of which is found in Capitalism and Slavery and The History of the People of Trinidad and Tobago, tends to stereotype the European planters and their descendents as "villains", and characterises the African slaves, and latterly their descendants, as "victims".
Besson's argument is that Williams consciously revised the British narrative about the abolition of the slave trade and emancipation to counter the conventional version which anchors the anti-slavery movements in British humanitarian concerns.
Williams claimed that he had unmasked a "gross historical lie" and had unmasked "a great academic conspiracy" which had lent credibility to the British claim that they were humanitarians who had a moral right to govern and civilise the colonies.
These arguments have, of course, long been the subject of academic argument and counterargument. For Besson, however, they are not matters that concern only academics. They have had great political consequences for Trinidad and Tobago and the Caribbean. As he complains, Dr Williams would carry his conspiracy theory about the abolition of the slave trade and emancipation forward into his political life.
He would develop a political programme that would exploit these ideas. His revisionist narrative pilloried the European population in Trinidad and Tobago not only as descended from slave owners, but also of inheriting their guilt, while ignoring the complicity of the Africans who had sold their fellow Africans in exchange for trade goods.
Besson makes two other basic points which are germane to his argument. One is that Williams' neurotic behaviour was informed by hostility to the white creole group to which his family belonged. In sum, his personality was misshaped by his belief that his family were "victims of the Will". The complaint was that the family was robbed or deprived of the various bequests that were made by their white relatives.
This obsessive reaction was projected unto the "true inheritors" of history's bequest, viz the Afro-creole masses. His politics was thus about "revenge" and racial entitlements. "He conveniently forgot that his own forbears, his father's people, had been slave owners."
Besson further argues that his "massa day" diatribe in 1960-61 was an attempt to exorcise his demons. It also excited the gullible and those inclined towards anti-white and anti-Indian racism.
As Besson writes, "the Afro-creole masses would inherit what he and his family could not. He may possibly have seen his personal history as the country's destiny. He utilised political control to compensate the Afro-Creole population for the inheritance that they had long been denied. This was the basis of Williams' interpretation of the ideal welfare state, and would later form an integral part of the political culture of the PNM and of the entire country over the next 50 years."
Besson's third thematic argument is that the paradigm that emerged from his version of history and which shaped the post independence politics of Trinidad and Tobago has now run its course. It is now time, he argued, to articulate an integrated New World narrative which treats all constituent groups as part of a whole.
All should be beneficiaries of the will, figuratively speaking. As he argues, and we quote him at some length, "the PNM's version of who was legitimate politicised victimhood and guilt and the scapegoating of certain of its members…and served to erode ethnic harmony, respect for law and order and notions of moral and civic responsibility in the collective mind of contemporary society. The Williams narrative has contributed to the feeling that everything is outside the law and is up for grabs or reinterpretation. Many civil institutions (the police force, the administration of justice, the education system) have lost credibility and are hardly capable of conveying meaning or confidence in civil society."
In sum, Williams and the PNM are seen to be largely responsible for most of our past and present discontents. Salvation lies in exposing the fallacies and the policies that emerge therefrom. Besson claims support in the experiences of Obama who, in his Audacity of Hope, also called for a new moral dispensation. As Obama had argued, "the role of victim was too readily embraced as a means of shedding responsibility, or asserting entitlement or claiming moral superiority over those not so victimised".
There are some who would dismiss the book a as an anti-PNM rant, which would be a mistake.
The book does debunk as myth a lot of what Williams and his supporters have said and did. There is however much in the book that is of great interest and which one would find intellectually provocative. It should spark public debate. The mood of the country in fact parallels some of the arguments of the book.
It is also clear that while Williams was responsible for much that was positive about our national development, we are also paying the price for some of the behaviours which he authorised and legitimised.
It is however too easy to blame almost everything that has gone wrong on the Williams narrative. Williams was part of a worldwide anti-colonial movement. His Massa Day Done rhetoric and his personal and cultural hubris fed on this worldwide Bandung spirit which would have flourished, stolen bequest or no stolen bequest. The discourse about the cult of the will make interesting reading, but is made to carry too much of the burden of what could be explained in other ways as I have attempted to do in my Eric Williams: The Myth and The Man.



"Paradox of Wills" 
by Kevin Baldeosingh 
(published in the Trinidad and Tobago Review, 2 July 2010)

This is really two books masquerading as one. In the first part, writer and publisher Gerard Besson gives a skilful demonstration of the historian’s art in microcosm, tracing through official records and personal family history the story of the Bessons’ settling in Trinidad. The second part, which is more polemic than history, examines the background and rise of Dr Eric Williams to become the first Prime Minister of Trinidad and Tobago.
The putative link between the two books is the custom of “placage” (concubinage) which created the mixed class in early Trinidad, since both Besson and Williams are products of this particular history. So the “will” in the title is a pun: the fortunes of the progeny of concubinage often depended on whether they were included in the wills of their white fathers or not. Williams’ family was mixed, but they had been left out of their ancestors’ inheritance. Thus, writes Besson, “I will suggest that Dr Williams’ political personality was constructed around 18th and 19th century events and that his perception of these events would eventually produce a political culture in which the role of the victim and the perpetuation of guilt were as readily embraced as they were easily politicised.”
One of the interesting sub-texts in Besson’s study, which unfortunately remains undeveloped, is the portrait of Trinidad’s white and black elites. “Some of the French patois-speaking Free Blacks and People of Colour had been wealthy land and slave-owners. By the early 19th century, Trinidad’s Afro-French/English Creole society had produced a small black and coloured educated middle class, which boasted a few university-trained professionals. Compared to other black and mixed people in the neighbouring islands, they had already gained a head start. Among these were the well-known Philippe, Romain, Beaubrun, Saturnin, Cadet, Boissière, Regis, Bicais, Rambert, and Langton families.” Similarly, the names of formerly prominent French-Creole and other whites – Collens, Bowen, de la Bastide, Wight, etc – give a rough idea of social mobility in the island.
Besson ends Part One of the book with an account of his father who, he writes, “was brought up by his mother’s brother, Simon Josse de l’Isle, and his family in Arima in unfortunate circumstances.” Joe Besson, also known as Boysie, was largely excluded from the family, wearing hand-me-downs from his older cousins, ill-treated by his uncle, and given only a rudimentary education. According to Besson, he was “left to fend for himself and make his way in the world, which he did with considerable charm.” Besson offers no speculation on how his father was able to overcome this disadvantaged childhood —a reticence that is perhaps understandable, but which stands in marked contrast to the extensive speculations about Williams that run through Part Two of the book.
Besson blames Williams and the PNM for many of the ills plaguing Trinidad and Tobago now. In his introduction to the second part, he writes, “I am attempting to alter the criteria of identity formation of Caribbean people along the lines of what I call the ‘cult of the will’. This cult or obsession, and the politics it has produced, apportions a false sense of inherited victimhood and entitlement to some, and to others inherited guilt and social embarrassment. It locks us in a perpetual state of irresponsibility and powerlessness, and makes us prisoners of the past.”
Besson adopts the “great man” theory of history, which assumes that individuals shape events rather than events facilitating individuals of particular skills and outlooks. He also has an explicit agenda in respect to the proper approach to history: “…the condemnation of what, in my view, amounts to the corruption of the scientific methodology of history for the popularisation of nationalistic politics in the mid-20th century.” But Besson himself is not entirely rigorous in his historical analysis since he has didactic ends in writing his study.
He devotes some pages, for example, to rejecting Williams’ thesis that the abolition of slavery was driven by economic rather than humanitarian motives, yet cites none of the scholars, not even Seymour Drescher, who have provided hard data undermining the argument. Besson also claims that in the 20 to 30 years after 1970, there was a “coarsening” of the society which he attributes to “Williams’ idea (which was accepted and carried forward by his successors) that the people of Trinidad and Tobago were still victims, and therefore could not be held individually accountable for their actions and that they were entitled to unearned benefits. This led to the collapse of civic and moral responsibility and expressed itself in the breakdown of civil society and the institutions that serve it.”
But Besson does not define what “coarsening” means, nor does he cite statistics or any other data to prove his argument that there was once an era of “civic and moral responsibility” in T&T which has now vanished. He could have referred to the rise in murders over the past decade, but how does the drop in infant mortality over the past 50 years, the reduction in race barriers, or the increase in literacy rates fit into his thesis? And does this coarsening, whatever it is, apply to Trinidad and Tobago as a whole or just to the Afro-Trinidadian segment? Besson also criticises what he terms the “moral relativism” of leftists, claiming that the PNM political culture is founded on this philosophy, without seeming aware that the logical obverse of “moral absolutism” has been responsible for greater historical evils and ignoring the fact that the core of PNM supporters are Christians. He is equally oblivious to the philosophical paradox of asserting that ideas in history and politics determine people’s attitudes, but that people should take individual responsibility for their actions.
So the first part of Besson’s book is a valuable, albeit limited, contribution to Trinidad’s history, delineating as it does the background of the island’s foundational elites. The second part may be interesting as polemic, but Besson fails to ground his argument in a manner which will persuade anyone who doesn’t want to be persuaded.



"Besson's cruel accusation"and "Single-mindedly Williams transformed our lives"
Part I and II of an article by Prof. Selwyn Cudjoe 
(published in the Trinidad Guardian, 23 July 2010 and on Trinidad and Tobago News Blog)

Gerard Besson’s The Cult of the Will seeks to challenge the historical orthodoxy that undergirds Dr. Eric Williams’s analysis of the causes of the abolition of slavery and the slave trade and the cruelty he perpetuated against the entire society although whites seems to come out worse in the bargain. According to Besson, Williams sought “to facilitate the stigmatization of Caribbean people of European descent, or those who appear so, through the projection of negative concepts of ‘slave master’ or ‘colonial master,’ to modern-day individuals for political and ideological purposes.”
In spite of its scholarly pretensions and Besson’s thoroughly misunderstood historical concepts and dubious psychological theories, The Cult of the Will turns out to be nothing more than an attempt to defend European (and more specifically, his family’s) privilege by debunking Dr. Williams’s academic and political work. In the process he asks us to accept the British representation of themselves as being concerned only with justice, humanity, and fairness toward enslaved Africans when they ended slavery and the slave trade.
To achieve this end, Besson makes extraordinary claims and fantastical mental leaps. His first claim is that Dr. Williams, a scion of the Besson family, acted as he did because he was cheated of a legacy that was rightfully his and hence Williams’s indulgence in what the author calls “inherited victimhood.” He argues that “the political personality of Dr. Williams was shaped by the 18th century Afro-French Creole plantation experience and the manner in which this was lived in and expressed in the 19th century by the coloured middle class of which he and his extended family were a part.”
Not content with this dubious proposition, he goes on to argue that Dr. Williams “may have been influenced, perhaps even manipulated, by C. L. R. James and other ideologues, who may have had knowledge of his personal circumstances and psychological weaknesses,” the supposition being that James and the other ideologues knew what Besson discovered only recently about Williams’s family history. Besson believes that James and Williams inflicted this tortured legacy upon an unwitting population of political nincompoops.
The book is short on evidence and long on speculation. In fact, it is inundated with so many “mays” and “maybes,” “may have been,” and “may have developed” that one is forced to conclude that speculation is substituted for evidence; bastard psychologizing replaces the logical causation of phenomena; and a jig-saw putting together of historical episodes stands in place of a solid methodological procedure. Such speculative thinking allows Besson to argue that Williams “may have developed the mulatto’s or red man’s complex: the so called ‘chip on the shoulder,’ a sense of racial inferiority; social as well as other inhibitions; and maybe he developed a pathologically suspicious and cynical attitude with regard to Europeans and even perhaps a strong animosity, a rage, against the French Creole community, the colonial establishment of his day, along with a distrust of the legal system that had not supported the family at redress” (my italics).
In the first place, it seems highly irregular that a political personality, or any personality, can be shaped and/or defined by a century prior to the one in which he lived. And while it is true that men’s actions are determined by the weight of the past, they do not make history in any way they choose. So that while Williams’s political activities were determined by 19th century Trinidad (it couldn’t be otherwise), it is difficult to see how his personality was shaped by a previous century in which the social and cultural imperatives were so different.
Such a preamble brings me to the central thrust of Besson’s argument against Williams’s contention that the primary cause for the demise of slavery and the slave trade was economic rather than humanitarian. Whatever one gives primacy to, economic or humanitarian forces, as the ultimately determining factor in history, one cannot ascribe purely subjective motives to Williams’s argument, something that Besson does throughout his book. Dr. Williams could not have written Capitalism and Slavery (1944) without the pioneering work that James did in Black Jacobins (1938), as James could not have written his work without the pioneering effort of Leon Trotsky’s History of the Russian Revolution (1930). None of these works could have been written before the advent of Marxist dialectics or a materialist conception of history.
It is also of interest to note that Williams dedicated Capitalism and Slavery to Lowell Joseph Ragatz, the author of The Fall of the Planter Class in the British Caribbean, 1763-1833 (1928), a pioneering study that traced the social and economic forces that shaped the Caribbean during that period. Ragatz was the first person Williams wanted to meet when he arrived at Howard University in 1939. Both James and Williams saw The Fall of the Planter Class as a model of scholarship. Ragatz, white and racist, made the following observations in his book: “The West Indian negro had all the characteristics of his race. He stole, he lied, he was simple, suspicious, inefficient, irresponsible, lazy, superstitious, and loose in his sex relations.” In spite of this, Williams could say that Ragatz’s “monumental labours in this field may be amplified and developed but can never be superseded.” This must have been quite a feat for racist Williams, his anti-white views, and his French Creole antipathies.
Besson has a different story to tell. According to his reading of history, Williams and James spoke in forked tongue that misled the natives. The world would have been such a better place if only we had dismissed James’s and Williams’s wrong-headed notions and accepted that the British had spoken “the truth in their rendering of history.” If we had done so, we would not have become the “victims of a conspiracy that withheld the truth about the abolition of slavery and the slave trade” that made us “suffer from colonial injustice and racial prejudice.”
How could Williams and James be so cruel to us?

***

Single-Mindedly Williams Transformed Our Lives
By Dr. Selwyn R Cudjoe
July 24, 2010
Part II

It is Besson’s contention that Williams and James lied to us about the role Africans played in the slave trade. Besson feels that it is only when one understands the magnitude of black (read African) culpability in the slave trade that one can understand how all the blame for the evil system of slavery should not be placed on European shoulders alone.
The Africans were just as guilty as the Europeans. Such realities lead Besson to conclude that Dr Williams’s “revisionist narrative pilloried the European population in Trinidad and Tobago as not only descended from slave-owners, but also inheriting their guilt, while ignoring the complicity of the Africans who sold their fellow Africans in exchange for trade goods.” Such an omission did not happen by chance. It was a part of Williams’s “cynical outlook” that was meant to enhance his “shrewd use of black nationalism” which forced his followers to “reject the existence of any truth in the moral impulse of the late 18th century English people, as expressed in ideas such as ‘justice and humanity.’”
It was the humanity that Rev James Phillippo, residing in Jamaica from 1823 to 1843, saw at first glance when he reported that the entire history of the colonies was “one revolting scene of infamy, bloodshed, and unmitigated woe, of insecure peace and open disturbance, of the abuse of power, and of the reaction of misery against oppression…slavery has been the curse of the West Indies.” (From James Phillippo Jamaica: Its past and present state, published in 1843.)
Moreover, if we accept Besson’s contention about British concern for justice and humanity, it forces us to reiterate the quizzical observation that James made of Sir Reginald Coupland, Oxford scholar and the chief proponent of the humanitarian thesis about the abolition of slavery, “Those who see in abolition the gradual awakening conscience of mankind should spend a few minutes asking themselves why it is man’s conscience, which had slept peacefully for so many centuries, should awake just at the time that men began to see the unprofitableness of slavery as a method of production in the West Indian colonies.” (From the 1938 edition of The Black Jacobins by CLR James). But things get worse. Williams, he says, misled the public because he “may [again the may] have harboured a deeply felt sense of injustice and deprivation due to his family’s unique circumstances.” This condition led Williams to indulge in “obsessive behaviour and phobias, deprivation and victimhood,” a condition so strong that “it may have become an obsession, perhaps a form of mental disorder, impairing contact to some degree with external reality, which is the definition of neurosis”.
This is Besson’s most audacious charge. Dr Williams was a mad man whose contact with external reality was skewed. No substantive evidence is provided; none is needed. All it takes is a sufficient repetition of “maybes” and “perhaps” and he is on the road to proving his case. All that is left to be said is that those of us (myself included) who followed Williams shared in his madness and his neurotic behaviour. It was in the political vineyard of T&T that Williams found his ignoble measure. Williams, he tells us, was one of the “vote manipulators” of the Third World who “may have originated racist attitudes and the scapegoating of present-day Trinidadians of European and particularly French descent” when he wrote History of the People of Trinidad and Tobago in which he “exile[d] half of the island’s population [the East Indians] from his narrative.”
“Massa Day Done” is Besson’s cause célèbre. He argues that in this 1961 address Williams expressed “the dislike and deep-seated prejudices felt by most Afro-Creoles towards Indians.” The “bitter words” in “Massa Day Done” indicated the “pathological changes associated with a neurosis” and that changed T&T’s racial history and inaugurated what he called racial stereotypes and scapegoats. One wished that Besson had read Yogendra Malik’s East Indians in Trinidad and VS Naipaul’s Middle Passage critically. He would have come away with a different view. But herein lies “the smoking gun” that Besson has been working toward to nail Williams to the psychological cross of deprivation and loss. It is revealed in two words, “frustration and inhibitions.” They are the keys that unlock Williams’s “frustrated black French Creole” identity; the link that takes him back to his displaced family relationships. It is these delusions that lead Williams to inflict his poisonous insecurities upon his people, a point that Ramesh Deosaran endorses in his blurb on the black cover of the book and in his correspondences with the author.
When I reviewed Deosaran’s Eric Williams, His Ideas and His Politics in 1981, I pointed out that his study would have yielded better results if he had used the tools of psychoanalysis rather than psychology when he tried to explain the complex drives that informed Dr Williams’s life and work. While it is true that a man liberates himself through his speech (or more specifically his discourses), Besson does not probe deeply into the gaps and lacunae of Williams’s texts to explore the contradictions in Williams’s behaviour. It is only through rigorous rethinking of Williams’s texts and what Antoine Vergote, a French scholar in psychoanalysis, calls “analytic listening,” that one can arrive at the psychic complexities that drive Williams.
In spite of the derogatory comments that Besson makes about Williams, he is not likely to erode Williams seminal role in the shaping of T&T’s politics in the second half of the 20th century and his magisterial contribution to the study of slavery and the slave trade. Many more studies will be done about Williams, but for the time being I prefer to rely on Arnold Rampersad’s judgment about Williams’s impact on T&T when he said: “Single-handedly and single-mindedly, Eric Williams transformed our lives. He swept away the old and inaugurated the new. He made us proud to be who we were, and optimistic as never before about what we were going to be, or could be. ‘Bliss was it in that dawn to be alive,’ and nothing that has transpired since in Trinidad can negate Williams’s gift to his people, or his triumph of intellect and spirit.”
In the years to come, someone will write the history of blacks in Trinidad. It might prove to be a worthy refutation of the half-truths that Besson propagated in this work, particularly in the last chapter, “The Afro-French Creole Narrative.” In the meantime, black people stand convicted by the slanderous twisting of their social and political activities during the last fifty years of their existence. May God have mercy on their souls as they continue to live in a state of delusion and perpetual victimhood.



by Prof. Ramesh Deosaran 
(published in Newsday, 28 November 2010)

PATHOLOGY. This refers to a branch of medicine regarding the causes and effects of diseases. Those of you who have been reading about or seeing the strange, often bizarre things done by some politicians, especially those in power for many years, might have often asked the question: Is he mad? What has gone wrong with him?
This question usually arises because there seems to be no reasonable explanation. There is growing evidence that political power leads to diseases of the mind. What Kenneth Clark calls in his seminal work, The Pathos of Power. This is an old, old story of politics and leaders of all kinds. What inspired me to think about this is a 282-page book titled Cult of the Will, published by Gerard A Besson, and containing strident remarks about the deceptions and the “deranged” political personality of the late Dr Eric Williams.
But before we get into some aspects of Besson’s book, I feel obliged to comment very briefly on the “pathology of politics,” a subject which caused JL Talmon to write a book titled The Origins of Totalitarian Democracy. Last September in Jamaica, during my address to Caribbean political party officials on election financing and democracy, a Grenadian party official asked me: “Why is it in the Caribbean, people appear and behave one way and as soon as they become elected as politicians they grow so arrogant, so different as if something gone wrong with them?”
The audience burst out laughing. PNM Opposition Leader, Dr Keith Rowley and Professor Selwyn Ryan, also present, smiled, knowingly it seemed. Yes, I too have seen the phenomenon in some of my own university colleagues who got elected. This ego-enhancing transformation has been a fascinating subject in psychopathology for ages, quite notably by Harold Lasswell, Sigmund Freud, Abraham Maslow and Carl Jung.
More and more, nurtured by excessive hero-worshipping and unchecked patronage, the diseased manifestations of political power — self-delusion, self-acclamations, bruising arrogance, unwarranted extravagance, thin-skinned, vengeful, etc. — all begin to inflict themselves upon a rather helpless public — at least for a time. Soon, the politician becomes a prisoner, a victim really, of his or her, search for further but scarcer gratifications, meandering between fleeting ecstasy and deep depression. Some get the sickness sooner than others.
With irritating insecurity, the politician gets a craving for more and more praise and reassurances, easily falling prey to a tightened circle of benefitting flatterers. This latter condition has been ascribed to Besson’s major subject, Eric Williams, by quite a few local commentators. However, as we also know, Williams still has his admirers who see his personality and deeds in more flattering terms. Besson’s book got reviews by John La Guerre, Selwyn Cudjoe, Brinsley Samarro and Selwyn Ryan. Then by columnists Marion O’Callaghan and Kevin Baldeosingh. For reasons of space, I will deal briefly with the second part of his two-part book — an explanation of victimhood and political mobilisation. Besson made a bold denunciation of the late Dr Eric Williams’ economic explanation for the abolition of slavery. Rather, Besson asserted both Williams and CLR James conveniently ignored the humanitarian anti-slavery movement and that Williams in particular, used a “victimhood” ideology to arouse black nationalism and achieve political victory. The reviewers could not resist dealing with the “victimhood” argument by Besson. The cult of the will, as he argues, creates a rather permanent condition of historically-generated victimhood, over one hundred years, and as sold by Williams and enthusiastically purchased by blacks. Cudjoe called this “a cruel accusation.”
If Besson had used Williams’ victimhood framework as a platform, then used contemporary political patronage, along the East West corridor for example, to link victimhood with what Besson clearly sees as continued “psychological dependency,” then his overall thesis might have gained further ground. But generally, in such subjects, social science inquiry, which is what Besson attempted in the later part of his book, finds great difficulty in linking cause and effect.
If Williams’ was an example of victimhood, it seemed to originate not so much from the historically-driven “cult” but self-inflicted through the psychological trappings of saturated political power. The way in which Besson presents his arguments is more courageous than many of us who prefer to be a bit more circumspect on such matters. And perhaps, there lies part of the value of his book. You know where he stands and you therefore know where to shoot. In a sense, Besson was trying to establish a level playing field for the society, a dismembering of a troublesome past for a more harmonious civic comradeship. But with early capitalism, slavery and indentureship as they were, how many will listen to this?
Professor Ramesh Deosaran (Emeritus) is author of “A Portrait of Political Power,” and Former Independent Senator.


Comments from our readers:


"I've also really enjoyed reading The Cult of the Will.  I agree with Besson's thoughts on the politics of "inherited guilt" and "inherited victimhood."  Barack Obama is trying to change that dynamic, but it is a hard road.  The white politicians and population still continue to dominate in the US society and the blacks and other ethnic minorities haven't gained much from the Obama administration.  Most of his supporters seem disappointed, but it has only been two years. Unfortunately, the right wing Republicans have gained more power and voice on the political stage - especially with the Tea Party group.  Listening to all of the rhetoric coming from the Republican primary candidates is very depressing." (From New Mexico, USA)

"I can’t put it down so will read myself into oblivion tonight." (from Tennessee, USA)

"The ending of Part 1 reduced me to tears as I understand so very much what that ring from your father must have meant to you...you have captured the essence of society in Trinidad during that time (and it's still a bit like that I think) and you've done so to such a degree that it has shaken me to the very fibre of my being.  It has answered for me, once and for all, profound questions that, until the Cult of the Will, the answers to which had remained elusive." (from British Columbia, Canada)
"I've just finished reading Part 1 of your book...This is in part to capture my thoughts and emotions in the moment which are deeply provoked from reading the Besson's history and the narrative regarding the placage. The historical research you have done is tremendous. ... The ending of Part 1 reduced me to tears as I understand so very much what that "ring" from your father must have meant to you." (from the USA)

"Your book just arrived and I have not been able to put it down. It is a real page turner, a terrific read. Hearty congratulations for a historical job well done." (from Florida, USA)

"The work is half history and then you take that history to develop your hypothesis in the second half -- and this is an interesting "change of pace " to the reader ... I found it a very "brave" work, in that you really challenged Williams and his cult in a way that no one had done before." (from Trinidad, WI)




"I am most impressed with it. It is important for these matters in the history of Trinidad to be dealt with so that there will be a real understanding of the history of this country." (from Trinidad, WI)

"It is handsomely printed but even more so it is obviously a triumph of history-researching and history-writing.  ... I can’t imagine the emotions you must have experienced, or the intellectuals shocks and aftershocks, as you discovered one thing after another about your family’s deep, distinguished history. And then there is the Williams connection and engagement, ... which comes into special relief when the whole story is before one.  I look forward to reading the book from cover to cover." (from California, USA)

"Your family history was fascinating, and to be able to go back as far as the 1700s to Pierre Besson and trace the family down through to Martinique and Grenada and finally Trinidad, must have taken some doing!  Just trying to search through records in another language is an achievement in itself. And then the photographs bring the story together, along with the family trees. Just amazing, and you must feel justifiably proud of your book. Congratulations!" (from Tobago)

"I didn't waste much time devouring your book, I was fascinated! ... The book is for me an eye opener and explains a lot." (from Corsica)




Letter from Prof. Selwyn Ryan:

"Dear Jerry,
I have just finished reading your paper which I did with great interest. It restates in greater detail much that you have shared with me over the years in conversations and in what you have written, I generally agree with much that you have argued. Indeed, much of what you assert forms part of my own critique of the Williams narrative which labels the Williams myth which I deconstruct. The main difference between the two accounts is that the link you make between 'Capitalism and Slavery' and Williams' 'Massa Dy Done Politics' is more determined and causal than it is in my version. Fundamentally, however, we do not disagree that the links are there. I was particularly impressed with your reconstruction of the two family links which readers would no doubt find intriguing. indeed, it might be good marketing to title the piece 'Victim of the Will: The Politics of Eric Williams'. We shall talk more soon.
Selwyn"